Managed Detection and Response (MDR) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) are two security solutions that are used to protect a company’s network and devices from cyber threats. Although they share similarities, there are several key differences between MDR and EDR.
MDR is a comprehensive security solution that involves managed security service providers (MSSPs) to monitor, detect and respond to security incidents on a company’s behalf. This service typically includes round-the-clock monitoring, threat hunting, and incident response services. In other words, the MSSPs take full responsibility for the security of a company’s network and devices.
EDR, on the other hand, is a security solution that is installed directly on a company’s endpoints, such as desktops, laptops, and servers. The purpose of EDR is to detect and respond to security incidents on these endpoints, allowing companies to protect their devices from cyber threats in real-time. EDR is typically less comprehensive than MDR, as it focuses primarily on endpoint security, but does not include services such as threat hunting or incident response.
In terms of cost, MDR can be more expensive than EDR as it involves the use of managed security service providers. However, this cost is offset by the comprehensive security coverage that MDR provides, which can be more cost-effective in the long run.
In conclusion, MDR and EDR are both security solutions that are used to protect a company’s network and devices from cyber threats. However, MDR is a comprehensive security solution that involves managed security service providers, while EDR is a security solution that is installed directly on endpoints. Both solutions have their advantages and disadvantages, and companies should consider their specific security requirements before deciding which solution is best for them.
